Sunday, September 29, 2013
I read Vanish because it was a 2006 Edgar Award nominee.
I watch Rizolli & Isles every week. Haven't missed an episode. Absolutely love the TV program.
The book is a good fun read.
But, in this book Jane Rizolli is married to an FBI agent. In the TV series she can't commit to a relationship with Casey, a soldier, because it will interfere with her job. In the book she she not only committed she's having a baby. I hate to admit it but this gave me a problem. I spent a lot of time comparing the characters on the page with the ones on TV.
I wonder what it is like to create a character and then have a TV series kidnap your character and send them down a different path from the one you chose in your books. I don't think I'd like it very much.
Thursday, September 26, 2013
This book was published in 1991. Twenty two years ago. It is a good book.
I've read that it takes 10,000 hours to develop a skill to a superior level. This book is a beautiful example. If you compare a current Coben novel, this one fades in comparison. It's good. But, you can see where Coben spent his 10,000 hours. Getting better.
This is encouraging to me. I know I can't write as well as Coben today. But maybe after 10,000 more hours I will be able to.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
I don't read very many terrorist thrillers. I'm stuck in the 60's enjoying MacLain, LeCarre, and Flemming. Nazis and communists made really good bad guys.
It may be that those threats were/are farther from home and not so threatening as the real time, real life terrorism we live with today.
Taylor writes a good read. It was very enjoyable.
Sunday, September 8, 2013
The book was originally published in 1982. It was criticized by a few Goodreads reviewers as "dated". I found it contained a lot of really good advice that was as currently relevant as books published this year.
Thirty-one years before Ms. Whitney wrote, "As a reviewer of children's books, I'd read the best of what was being published, and now I set out to discover what constituted a 'better book.' I found out: It was nearly always a book that said something worth saying. Said something. That was what made certain books stand out over so many others! Significance, meaning a message, not the obvious, not just the same cliches. . .
If you don't have this emotional involvement, throw the subject away. You can't fake conviction. Whatever you want to say in your fiction must come out of what you believe and feel."
I give the book 4 stars.